In my travels, I often hear short stories that help to illuminate my work and the world.Here are three recent examples, see you as a little health policy tapas.
I spoke recently at a meeting with Peter Pronovost, the Johns Hopkins Intensivist, who is the world's top researchers in safety and quality. We talked about why involved doctors in this work - so called "adaptive change" - is sometimes so difficult. Peter recalls a story about his son came at age 6 home and told his parents that he give the school bathroom was afraid. "There are monsters there," he said.His parents assured him that it is not, but the next day, he, wide-eyed and in panic to see zurückgegeben.Peter called the school if they had no explanation for his son's sudden bathroom phobia. "Oh, we get in automatic flush toilets last week, and I think, it didnt we declare the children," said the teacher.
Peter's point was that we often questions, doctors (and other health care), to absorb, without understanding the background and tools you need you tremendous amount of change this "Monster". It is to remember a lesson.
At the same Conference I went to a great session from a colleague UCSF, Adams Dudley, an other intensive care doctor and one of the nation experts on the effects of transparency and pay for performance strategies on quality given.Adams was discussion, his observation that doctors often feel they - are affected differently than any other soul on the planet - of non-monetary incentives. He told this story:
Last year, Adams was asked by the American Academy of Neurology to speak at an extraordinary meeting on pay for performance and public reporting.His specific free the following question was: "professionals respond to incentives?" As he described his invitation, Adams made it a point to the term highlight "Professionals" - a carefully chosen word, was the unique differ from "People" should be "Doctors" or even "neurologists."It is one of the these terms embedded his answer in it: If you were really a professional, it seems to say, his or her clinical judgment would be so crass not affected by something as money.
How was he Adams mulling his eyes to another document in his speakers were what audience of brain experts to this august, packet, a legally defined form titled "syllabus contribution policy". The AAN, how many Conference hosts speakers too early in your PowerPoint slides to page, so that in the curriculum printed or posted online can. will always the speakers to do so, to nature, a challenge - generally addressed with plaintive and later frantic email reminders, rounded by from begging.
The AAN, but adopted a different approach.Read on, Adam learned...
…Faculty, the finish date of the syllabus received an additional $100 [their usual fees] …. Faculty of not helping the program curriculum without prior authorisation gives no fee.
In other words, was the world's leading society for the study of the brain - one Adams at was asked whether the monetary incentives could affect the behavior of the "professionals" - provides a $100 bonus payment % penalty for underperformance for good behavior and a 100 sophisticated, when it came to syllabus submission. I think the Romans had a term for this: Res Ipsa Loquitur.
Finally, should a few months ago I talked about improving the quality and safety for the staff of a large health care system, and went on a reef about all support get Advisor from your hospital to improve performance.I have the point which ultimately implemented hospitals that more resources - help man and IT - to educate both and should support their carers at the bedside.
"One of the doctors of that invasive cardiologist kept me in my tracks.""Actually our hospital already offers an enormous amount of support and feedback," he said."When I run a catheterization or angioplasty, a hospital staff watches the whole process will sometimes security layer corrections and, once I'm done me offers detailed feedback on whether I meet all the best practice standards."
"I said"Wow,".""Your hospital is really serious quality take!"
"Oh," answered he, mischievous smile on his face, "She is by the quality Department.""She's from the billing department."
The point is, of course, that hospitals traditionally enjoyed a great return on your investment in improved billing haben.Allerdings has the business case, similar energy into improving the quality and safety unfortunately gefehlt.Dies starts to change, but not enough to the idea that this cardiologist's shadow from the quality Department would seem to be anything but absurd.Wir know that we have made it if such a scenario seems no longer impossible.
* * *
I am constantly by the power of a good story to illustrate the fundamental truths in our crazy world beeindruckt.Obwohl data and charts can be powerful tools, I find that nothing can match a great anecdote in promoting the remarkably deep understanding.
November 8, 2010 |Permalink"More IT?""I have the point which ultimately implemented hospitals that more resources - help man and IT - to educate both and should support their carers at the bedside."These are in fact monster, but not yell; and should have actually flushed, until we know you with science, not silently, slowly and derivatively facilitate deaths of patients who would otherwise not died.
No comments:
Post a Comment